On 01/06/18 07:01, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 05/31/2018 12:24 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) wrote:
This causes package_$pkgname() to be preferred over package() in the non-split case, but the behavior if both functions exist was undocumented anyway.
We don't document the behavior of arbitrary user-defined functions. package_$pkgname() is only defined as having meaning in the context of the PACKAGE SPLITTING section of the documentation.
IMHO this is us documenting that package() is the only correct function unless ${#pkgname[@]} > 1.
I think it is far more intuitive to behave that way, and I'd actually be willing to refuse to use package_$pkgname even if it is the only one...
We discussed on IRC to abort if both are present as undefined behavoiur. Allan