31 Aug
2016
31 Aug
'16
5:05 a.m.
On 31/08/16 11:13, Alastair Hughes wrote:
We weren't supplying the rpl_malloc function needed if this failed, and didn't check for realloc, so just remove.
Signed-off-by: Alastair Hughes <hobbitalastair@gmail.com> ---
The build will currently fail if cross compiling or if ac_cv_func_malloc_0_nonnull=no is set, because we don't supply a rpl_malloc function anywhere. As we don't use AC_FUNC_REALLOC either, just assume that we will never encounter a buggy system and remove the check.
The other option appears to be to provide a malloc definition somewhere, but in that case it appears that we should also check for realloc.
I'm unsure which one should be used - opinions?
We are not providing a malloc definition... So this patch is fine. Allan