On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:00:59PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
From signal man page : "The behavior of signal() varies across Unix versions, and has also varied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use: use sigaction(2) instead. See Portability below."
The code was taken from there : http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libc/Sigaction-Function-Example.h...
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> --- src/pacman/pacman.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman.c b/src/pacman/pacman.c index f46b71c..9c56eae 100644 --- a/src/pacman/pacman.c +++ b/src/pacman/pacman.c @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static void cleanup(int ret) { * in a consistant state. * @param signum the thrown signal */ -static void handler(int signum) +static void termination_handler(int signum) Any real reason to rename the function?
Not at all, I just made up the handler name by my previous commit. Then I just copied the code from the link above, which was using termination_handler :) I didn't know which one was better.