On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:09:27AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 11/11/10 07:29, Nezmer wrote:
> >But with those changes pacman did not like my ZFS pool.
> 
> From a bit of google, it looks like the statvfs call is probably
> returning EOVERFLOW on that so we can probably just assume LOTS of
> space and move on in those conditions...
> 
> Allan
> 
> 

That's over-simplification. This is the quick patch I needed to make
this even compile.