1 Jul
2009
1 Jul
'09
9:22 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:19 AM, unohu<unohu0@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO it is a lack of direction rather than lack of man power. If there is a > correct road map/consensus of what/how we want to implement, i am sure there > are few persons here(including me) who would like to see this implemented > and are ready to work on this. > > I understand that the current pacman devs are quite busy at the moment with > next 3.3 release, but if they can come up with a higher level design of what > needs to be implemented, we can start working on the boring part of coding > and other details :) . > > This will also remove the uncertainty of whether the patches will get > accepted or will need a complete rework after spending a lot of time on > this. I don't know if anyone really has a clear idea of how this should work. So it's difficult to give a "high level" design here. >From my point of view: * Should be optional, possibly per repo (so we can use signed packages from core and extra, and unsigned packages from mycustomrepo) * Needs to get keys from some keychain somehow * Should be rather transparent once turned on That's all I really care about.