22 Jul
2009
22 Jul
'09
4:16 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Dan McGee<dan@archlinux.org> wrote:
OK, that last one looks a bit silly with the paths at the top, doesn't it. Any ideas? I'd be fine with showing the 0 errors lines all the time, it would just require some grep foo for people to screen those out. That way, you can do things like this (note that the output is slightly edited from what this patch will produce, it is showing the output even with 0 missing files):
I would be fine with never printing 0 error line, and dropping the verbose output. -Qk and -Qkq are just fine like that in my opinion.