15 Jan
2008
15 Jan
'08
2:33 p.m.
Dan McGee wrote:
Cool. It looks like that -- is from a misinterpretation of the gettext msg* program, which is no big deal (but did the other message make it in there?). It doesn't look like it did, unfortunately.
It did make it, so everything is alright on this side.
Keep that other message in mind and we can do one of two things- I'll sed all the translations right before we release (probably best) or I'll patch it immediately following 3.1.1.
Since I believe this string is quite rare, I'm fine with either way.