On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please report any issues you may find with this package, as it is getting very close to being an actual releasable version. These are debug builds with symbols, so getting stack traces and helpful logging should be relatively straight forward if necessary.
I'm using it in a daily basis and it is very good! I just have one issue with pacman-key. I'm using --lsign-key to sign keys locally, so gpg trusts them for validating signatures. But pacman-key is confirming the process without asking me. It just feeds 'y's to gpg, so it signs the keys without I having the chance of doing manual validation of fingerprints. I think pacman-key should just let gpg handle the process, showing information about the key and asking if I agree with that. For example, if one uses --edit-key to sign keys, a manual confirmation is needed to get a key signed. Do you agree? I can send a patch, if that's the case. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------