-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Allan McRae wrote:
This shouldn't generate new dependencies, as makepkg already needs to know which packages are needed for building the package. So its a specialization of the already provided dependencies. If it's not, it's a bug in the PKGBUILD.
Well, then... what is the point? Versioned dependencies already cover soname values if the package is listed as a dep in addition to is library.
Allan
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2009-August/006873.html The problem was that libarchive-2.7.0-1 needed liblzma.so.0 (which wasn't in the depends array). With this patch sodep-32-liblzma.so.0 would have been in the depends array -> no system breakage possible even if the maintainer doesn't know he forgot a dependency. - -- Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewind}@server-speed.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKhulKAAoJEG0WVcFM4cE+Lg0QAJLeQuYfDG15ctgXUFODjArT O3/HVLEnoxydieaG1go5F4k9igEwsAGL3MM7Z0qt/BtSe1gymZGB6ZfHRmtsJhbG +9hq4vO6q6PLnjot4riAXp3oyFhx6fNDcHc6WeLLiFXjm5Lz0ypN79ZU88Hd5q0U Jyw4DXOQKZQzQjWTafZkMg5L8V8e0zY2Zg8d9Ea0MIWgFyCxWiaWjmcrB/MKnanx pZStxL6QePXe85iq29zZNPBP8IV5V8gf98xZZWo71uTBNprtNkvs8il+Yq9cY4dN 90iLHjcoqKpg5yYl3UiEaHGv7xJPRXScr96K/wXty2xG3QzT6wqdHbryZ8i4DMUD U9BH0MIJBhx0mSuvz7u/88uyVHFZEe0ZCmwiPbw42nl3aN67tBUm4hOSpdgb4War elmZnjBrsnies2CCq25+nPr7UJLhF3ORr490T6yyT/5vQeOZ1McrVdGxrQhrTNY5 D5KCZFdx/dJD5CCiFErHVHAFWrSM/JyAra9EaRbeXZyBtnFxOTQKvd+uax8PgQ/q VncoUSlMUcHAYH1ksDWKnuZwkNYzQAY9SLYtcK0UCRDQfFX0bSAnXBvY4hyaky72 fZGZRlfJimUZgLuyRsnyoZRRecG3wMyA7HOV4F2JCMuz9DiJc5D/ySAh6I+HabJG Uc3FWXBQ3u5MwgT4yJOX =0tA5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----