On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com> wrote:
Fixed no-vimset bail, reverted plain "", fixed bail on no sums by default; source makepkg.
Allan, I know you are busy these days, so I can take a hack at reviewing this but I'd also like to hear what other people think of the idea in general. I know we just closed a feature request asking for this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15809
There is a discussion going on in http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15051 . Xavier has had a good look at this and posted an updated patch there. The remaining issue is PKGBUILDs with architecture specific checksums.
/me lets the discussion continue without him :P
Well the discussion was already almost over if you look at the comments :) The problem is that this requires some sed/awk skills and I have none at all. The sed commands proposed until now either did not work or failed in bad ways on some pkgbuilds, deleting parts of it. The awk way seemed more reliable than the sed ones : { rm PKGBUILD; awk '$0 ~ /^md5sums/ {i = 1; system("makepkg -g 2>/dev/null")}; !i {print}; $0 ~ /\)/ {i = 0}' > PKGBUILD; } < PKGBUILD But does it makes sense to incorporate this in makepkg ? To have makepkg call himself ?