Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
This allows makepkg to only build a specified subset of packages from a split PKGBUILD. This is very useful in combination with the -R flag or when bumping the pkgrel of a single package.
Fixes FS#15956.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> ---
As always, my changes to the documenation could be improved. Suggestions welcome.
Would you mind splitting the ARGLIST patch into a separate one? It seems pretty independent and might be good to explain a bit more by itself in a commit message. (Easiest way to split a patch is probably git-reset HEAD^, then git add -i, ...)
No problem.
doc/makepkg.8.txt | 5 +++++ scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/makepkg.8.txt b/doc/makepkg.8.txt index ec02875..8c68143 100644 --- a/doc/makepkg.8.txt +++ b/doc/makepkg.8.txt @@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ Options remote builder, or a tarball upload. Because integrity checks are verified, all source files of the package need to be present or downloadable.
+*\--pkg <`list`>*:: + Builds only the listed packages. Useful in combination with package + splitting. The use quotes is necessary when specifying multiple + packages. e.g. `--pkg "pkg1 pkg3"` +
If I wasn't reading this with split packages in mind, I might think this is some sort of yaourt automatic system where it goes an finds the package I want. "Builds only the designated packages in a split package build script" or something? I don't know. Now of course I just read the second sentence and see that you cleared it up; it might be worth trying to get the package splitting actually in the first sentence for stupid people like me that only read the first sentence. And "The use of quotes" might be what you were looking for.
*\--noconfirm*:: (Passed to pacman) Prevent pacman from waiting for user input before proceeding with operations. diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in index 7e10eef..c3672b1 100644 --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ IGNOREARCH=0 HOLDVER=0 PKGFUNC=0 SPLITPKG=0 +PKGLIST="" COLORMSG=0
# Forces the pkgver of the current PKGBUILD. Used by the fakeroot call @@ -1243,6 +1244,15 @@ check_sanity() { done fi
+ if [ -n "$PKGLIST" ]; then
This would only check the first item in $PKGLIST, is that ok?
I think that is fine.
+ for pkg in ${PKGLIST[@]}; do + if ! in_array $pkg ${pkgname[@]}; then + error "$(gettext "requested package %s is not provided in %s")" "$pkg" "$BUILDSCRIPT" + return 1 + fi + done + fi + return 0 }
@@ -1466,6 +1476,7 @@ usage() { echo "$(gettext " --asroot Allow makepkg to run as root user")" printf "$(gettext " --config <file> Use an alternate config file (instead of '%s')")\n" "$confdir/makepkg.conf" echo "$(gettext " --holdver Prevent automatic version bumping for development PKGBUILDs")" + echo "$(gettext " --pkg <list> Only build listed packages from a split package")"
So for the man page doc, this sentence is maybe succinct enough to be the lead sentence, then follow it with more detail.
echo "$(gettext " --skipinteg Do not fail when integrity checks are missing")" echo "$(gettext " --source Generate a source-only tarball without downloaded sources")" echo @@ -1496,13 +1507,13 @@ if [ ! $(type -t gettext) ]; then } fi
-ARGLIST=$@ +ARGLIST=("$@")
# Parse Command Line Options. OPT_SHORT="AcCdefFghiLmop:rRsV" OPT_LONG="allsource,asroot,ignorearch,clean,cleancache,nodeps" OPT_LONG="$OPT_LONG,noextract,force,forcever:,geninteg,help,holdver" -OPT_LONG="$OPT_LONG,install,log,nocolor,nobuild,rmdeps,repackage,skipinteg" +OPT_LONG="$OPT_LONG,install,log,nocolor,nobuild,pkg:,rmdeps,repackage,skipinteg" OPT_LONG="$OPT_LONG,source,syncdeps,version,config:" # Pacman Options OPT_LONG="$OPT_LONG,noconfirm,noprogressbar" @@ -1540,6 +1551,7 @@ while true; do -m|--nocolor) USE_COLOR='n' ;; -o|--nobuild) NOBUILD=1 ;; -p) shift; BUILDFILE=$1 ;; + --pkg) shift; PKGLIST=$1 ;; -r|--rmdeps) RMDEPS=1 ;; -R|--repackage) REPKG=1 ;; --skipinteg) SKIPINTEG=1 ;; @@ -1722,6 +1734,11 @@ fi
pkgbase=${pkgbase:-${pkgname[0]}}
+if [ -n "$PKGLIST" ]; then + unset pkgname + pkgname="${PKGLIST[@]}" +fi + if [ "$SPLITPKG" -eq 0 ]; then if [ \( -f "$PKGDEST/${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-${CARCH}${PKGEXT}" \ -o -f "$PKGDEST/${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-any${PKGEXT}" \) \ @@ -1914,11 +1931,10 @@ else fi
msg "$(gettext "Entering fakeroot environment...")" - if [ -n "$newpkgver" ]; then - fakeroot -- $0 --forcever $newpkgver -F $ARGLIST || exit $? + fakeroot -- $0 --forcever $newpkgver -F "${ARGLIST[@]}" || exit $? else - fakeroot -- $0 -F $ARGLIST || exit $? + fakeroot -- $0 -F "${ARGLIST[@]}" || exit $? fi fi fi -- 1.6.5.1
Without testing, I'm not sure how the flipflopping between treating $PKGLIST like a string and an array works, but it seems scary. Am I missing something obvious about the way bash does this?
The short answer is that it works... although I am sure someone could find and edge case where it does not. I will adjust it to use array syntax always. Allan