8 Jul
2008
8 Jul
'08
8:33 a.m.
Please use pm_printf with an applicable level- INFO perhaps? We have no INFO level, which is a bit funny, indeed (we simply use WARNING from back-end in these cases). So I don't know what to do here. When I wrote this patch, I just looked around in sync.c and I found a lot of pure printf there. So we may want to introduce PM_LOG_INFO in separate commit, and replace printfs to pm_printf in front-end. Is this OK or did I misinterpret something?
I just rewrote the 2 remaining commit message for now, and added -R group pactest. Bye