27 Feb
2007
27 Feb
'07
4:18 p.m.
On 2/27/07, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
Hi! I attached my upgrade052.py file.
I committed this as upgrade055.py, with some small changes (description and added rules). Pactest currently passes this test with your patch applied, and fails without. Thanks for finding something. I am holding off on committing your patch because that function is quite ugly to begin with- we may want to do some more serious overhauling of it. Thanks for making the test case though, these are really helpful. And for anyone else out there that finds a bug, a test case using pactest to duplicate it is wonderful, as it makes the description of the problem a lot more concrete. -Dan