12 Jul
2013
12 Jul
'13
7:20 a.m.
You mean -Qi? And like we already do?
Heh, whoops. You're quite right. I'd still like a second opinion on removing optional installed packages from the output, though. On 07/12/2013 01:17 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 12/07/13 16:06, Drew DeVault wrote:
What if we just did not print installed optional dependencies? I'm open to that idea, but hesitant to completely remove them. Maybe we can adjust the output of pacman -Si to include this status in the optional dep list? I'd like additional opinions for either of these changes.
You mean -Qi? And like we already do?