13 Mar
2012
13 Mar
'12
11:23 a.m.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at> wrote:
On 13.03.2012 12:05, Allan McRae wrote:
I do understand the branch name is useless once you have a tag/commit id. That is why later in the email I said it only really serves as documentation.
Use comments for that.
So just how do you propose using a comment to describe origin/maint in the pacman repository to build my pacman-maint-git package? I don't follow this logic one bit...you clearly need to use a branch name, not some arbitrary sha1 that never moves forward with new commits... -Dan