On 06/10/10 08:52, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 06/10/10 08:37, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
And looking closer at my numbers, did we not lose time here? If you through the read() calls out (which I left in only because that was the top time user), I should do some new timings or someone else should as well...
Slower it is! Non-truncated test output below after two warm up runs of each.
I just replicated the same result. It is even worse if you drop all caches before running the strace.
Off to the trash bin for this patch then? Performance improvements that don't really improve performance are kind of a downer, unless someone shows me results on OS X or Cygwin that this is a huge win and worth keeping around.
Agreed.