On Tue, 16 May 2006 22:40:33 +0200 VMiklos <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:09:02PM +0200, x.chantry@wanadoo.fr wrote:
First, I've to say that I don't see the point of NoUpgrade feature.
it was usefull in pacman2 but it's not necessary in pacman3, you're right
Ha no I wasn't even aware of the difference about this in pacman3. I was just referring to the fact that config files edited by the user are never overwritten by pacman, so I thought it wasn't necessary (as soon as config files likely to be edited are in the backup section). It can still be useful in some cases I don't see :)
I've made a patch that makes NoUpgrade behave less annoyingly
looks good to me, tought of course the final word is Aurelien's or Judd's one ;)
ps: please keep the length of your lines under 80 chars, it's a bit annonying
Sorry about these long lines, I copied them from the current code, but the diff makes them even longer. XC