[pacman-dev] libalpm or libpacman?

Hey guys, I'm wondering if "Arch Linux Package Management" is the best name for the new package library. I'm mainly concerned for relatively big utilizers - currently only Frugalware - but also people such as LFS users who seek a nice package management utility. (Of course all of them should be using Arch as we all know it's superior! ;-)) libpacman doesn't sound too good, but any less flavored name should do the trick. I guess it all boils down to whether pacman is "a package manager" or "the Arch Linux package manager" - so, what is it? :-) -- Mark Rosenstand ,;-, ,oOQ Arch Linux /_,K` (§§) Department of Footware ` ` `G