23 Aug
2007
23 Aug
'07
12:59 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:53:28PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
And Nagy as well : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009082.html One more argument for universal transactions: Now it's not easy to replace a package "by hand". For example if I want to replace mplayer with mplayer-svn I can do pacman -Rd mplayer then pacman -S mplayer-svn, but I might have broken some deps. (Cascade remove doesn't help here either.). With universal transaction this would be easy.
Since mplayer-svn provides/conflicts with mplayer, what's the problem with just doing : pacman -S mplayer-svn ?