14 Jan
2006
14 Jan
'06
12:26 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:43:52PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
Why not immediately check the replace value after the for() iteration added by the patch, and do something like:
/* we don't care about a to-be-replaced package's newer version */ for(j = trans->packages; j; j=j->next) { ... } if(replace) { continue; }
Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests?
no, there isn't. here is an updated patch: http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/replace_dont_upgra... udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org