5 Mar
2014
5 Mar
'14
5:41 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:38:57PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
On 14-03-05 10:50:30, Dave Reisner wrote:
Ok, I'll bite. Why aren't we working on merging expac (or something like expac)? Adding yet another tool tool which relies on parsing unstable output from pacman seems like a step in the wrong direction.
I know it's not the place to report this, but talking about it, expac is under MIT license, while the package in the repo is marked as GPL. Anyhow, what is pacman's policy on merging third-party software with non-GPL license?
Poof. As the sole author, I allow it to be licensed under $insert_any_license_compatible_with_gpl. MIT is totally compatible with GPL, btw....