14 Mar
2006
14 Mar
'06
12:35 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:40:26PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
Finally, I think pacman 3.0 is the right moment to implement it.
hm, not sure about this. the libarchive patch was rejected as "we have enough changes for 3.0". i think this backend change is much more problematic than the libarchive one... what about first just do the TODO, release 3.0, and _after_ start to work on this? udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org