20 Jun
2015
20 Jun
'15
10:39 a.m.
On 20.06.2015 09:31, Allan McRae wrote:
I see that the output is similar to -Ql and -Qo, but I think it's still better to use a more verbose and easier to parse (e.g. `cut -d\ -f 2-`) format. Especially with regard to the possibility of a package being in multiple repositories which can't happen with -Q.
As discussed on IRC I'll work on a -m switch that outputs an easy to parse format ($repo/$pkgname $pkgver: $file) once the patches are reviewed and merged.