28 Mar
2009
28 Mar
'09
9:21 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
$ ./src/pacman/.libs/lt-pacman -Qy glibc pacman-git glibc 2.9-4 pacman-git 20090116-1 file n°1512 (package 2/2): OK No damaged packages.
We should probably only do verification and not print the names of the packages and run them through filters, unless anyone else has an opinion.
Part of me would like to see: Checking glibc 2.9-4... OK Checking pacman-git 20090116... OK ...etc... Verification Complete 1512 files checked (2 packages) But... that could be a lot of output. It might be cleaner to see: Checking for missing files for installed packages # if any errors, output like: pacman-git: Missing file /etc/pacman.conf # endif Verification Complete: 1512 files (2 packages)