On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
[10] pacman -Sw Outputs are wrong compared to pacman 2.9 Do not use log callbacks when the -w is used? or filter all outputs in trans.c depending on the downloadonly flag?
heh, it seems i always take the last item ;) i would say filter the output in trans.c, so that the fronend is allowed to choose if it asks the user or not here is a patch for that: http://darcs.frugalware.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=pacman;a=plain_commitdif...;
=> it should be done as the last step before a first release to avoid introducing too much changes to the CVS code at once.
this comment was about the alpm symbol item, imho it could be removed :) udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org