14 Jan
2006
14 Jan
'06
8:19 a.m.
VMiklos wrote:
Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests?
no, there isn't.
OK.
here is an updated patch: http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/replace_dont_upgra...
This one won't work: the continue command can only bypass the end of the code from the _current_ loop. As a consequence, it must be called outside the double for() loop. I applied your first patch with the proposed rework. -- Aurelien