Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] don't care about a to-be-replaced package's newer version

VMiklos wrote:

...

Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests?

no, there isn't.

OK.

here is an updated patch: http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/replace_dont_upgra...

This one won't work: the continue command can only bypass the end of the code from the _current_ loop. As a consequence, it must be called outside the double for() loop. I applied your first patch with the proposed rework. -- Aurelien