25 Oct
2009
25 Oct
'09
10:58 a.m.
Laszlo Papp wrote:
* The alpm_rmrf function is available from the api, which does the same as this function did, with a small sanity check.
* It was worth to establish alpm_rmrf for _alpm_rmrf for pacman frontend as a wrapper to be able to use it in the future or for other frontend, so the function declaration was deleted in the frontend, and the new alpm_rmrf wrapper function was established for future usage with SYMEXPORT modifier.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> ---
What about this approach ?
What is different and how does this address the comments Xavier and Dan made earlier? Allan