Idézés Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Why? Isn't HoldPkg already equivalent to RemoveIgnorePkg? This sounds
like
unnecessary complication to me. However, the scope of HoldPkg might be extended for covering Rc and Rs too, as you suggested.
Ehh, indeed;-) I totally misinterpreted HoldPkg, but now I've read our manual;-) If HoldPkg == RemoveIgnorePkg, then why we need user confirmation for removing them if he listed the package in the "command line" (package was added by remove_addtarget)? This is not done with IgnorePkg neither. So they are not "symmetric" in this way. RemoveIgnorePkg (and so Holdpkg) has real meaning in case of -Rc and -Rs only (imho), when pacman does some auto-magic stuffs; not when I do pacman -R holdpkg, because then I really want to remove holdpkg.
Indeed, that was my opinion for ignorepkg, and by symmetry, for holdpkg :) With the difference than removing is more dangerous :P And that IgnorePkg is usually set by the user, while HoldPkg is set by default to pacman and glibc. So I don't know..
Exactly. Thus holdpkg cannot be set from command-line neither. So apart from the auto-generated holdpkgs for "dangerous" removals [but come on, who wants to remove glibc or pacman with -R ?!] the current HoldPkg is pointless imho. Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/