Sure, does this mean you want a new version for all of them? On Jul 19, 2013 10:30 PM, "Allan McRae" <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 20/07/13 12:03, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:12:35AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 19/07/13 09:29, Dave Reisner wrote:
+check_pacsave(){ + for f in "${1}" ${1}.[0-9]; do Strange that you quoted one of these but not the other. You're hitting the same 10+ pacsave problem here, too.
for f in "$1"{,.+([0-9])}
Question: do we actually care about that? Getting pacsaves with that many suffixes actually takes quite a bit of effort.
Allan
It doesn't require a whole lot of effort to support -- I see no reason to implement the correct solution rather than a 90% solution.
OK:
@Jonathan: the "Search and ..." patch will need adjusted too.