17 Jun
2016
17 Jun
'16
4:19 a.m.
On 16/06/16 10:01, Andrew Eikum wrote:
I get bit by this fairly often when I build AUR packages. From my perspective as a user, the distinction between -U and -S seems irrelevant: I just want to install this package. So let's just have pacman offer to Do What I Mean and install the files if I use -S when I should have used -U.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Eikum <coldpie@fastmail.com>
---
RFC because this lacks tests and maybe UI polish, but I thought I'd see if there's interest in this change before I put more effort into it.
I am interested... I have a more general comment. Why do we distinguish between -S and -U at all? @Andrew: you are looking at unified transactions. Do you think merging -S and -U makes sense. Allan