11 Nov
2010
11 Nov
'10
3:03 p.m.
On 12/11/10 00:46, Nezmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:09:27AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 11/11/10 07:29, Nezmer wrote:
But with those changes pacman did not like my ZFS pool.
From a bit of google, it looks like the statvfs call is probably returning EOVERFLOW on that so we can probably just assume LOTS of space and move on in those conditions...
That's over-simplification.
OK... care to explain is some detail that actually might be useful to fixing this?