Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Splitting up makepkg into libmakepkg

On 04/09/13 06:15, keenerd wrote:

Splitting up makepkg seems a little silly.

A >3000 line bash script that is virtually impossible to comprehensively test is silly.

This might qualify as "too simple", but please consider something like this this:

[ $1 == "--as-lib" ] && return

You place this between the function definitions and the main body of the script. When you do a

source makepkg --as-lib

then it will load all the functions and bail out before getting to the main code.

Having a library available is not the point of this. I'd guess very little else is actually going to use it. A