Shoud I change my patch to use zipdoc/docdirs as Xavier suggested? It's trivial, so I just need an ok from other devs. :) Tiago Xavier escreveu:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
This seems a good idea to me and the patch looks good. One small comment below.
Tiago Pierezan Camargo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tiago Pierezan Camargo <tcamargo@gmail.com> --- doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt | 7 +++++++ etc/makepkg.conf.in | 2 ++ scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 9 ++++----- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt b/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt index ca9df02..d6dd7dd 100644 --- a/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt +++ b/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt @@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ Options that are located in opt/, you may need to add the directory to this array. *NOTE:* Do not add the leading slash to the directory name. +**MAN_DIRS=(**{usr{,/local}{,/share},opt/*}/{man,info} ...**)**:: + If "zipman" is specified in the OPTIONS array, this variable will + instruct makepkg where to look to compress manpages and docs. If you + build packages that are located in opt/, you may need to add the + directory to this array. *NOTE:* Do not add the leading slash to + the directory name. Maybe change the description a bit:
...this variable will instruct makepkg where to look to compress man and info-pages.
What about renaming the variable to be more relevant in the same time?
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-August/012787.html
-- Tiago Pierezan Camargo milopi @ irc.freenode.net