13 Mar
2012
13 Mar
'12
12:58 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:54:52PM -0600, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 03/12/2012 05:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
I thought that requiring a package to be named appropriately to be considered a development package was at least worthy of discussion.
Why not display a warning? Automagically modifying things is very unlike what pacman tools do, but vcs naming conventions are something I'd like to see encouraged. Since I'm currently out of aur helpers, I search for packages manually by name and missing packages because they don't stick to the convention is something I'd like to avoid. So, while we're at it, what other approaches on this can you suggest? Downloading pkgbuilds and checking the way mathew's code does now? cheers! mar77i