On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 06:08:10PM -0400, Jason St. John wrote:
On Apr 24, 2013 1:15 AM, "Allan McRae" <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 23/04/13 17:15, William Giokas wrote:
Originally from Jason St. John's patch, This is a much simplified version explaining some basic functions the four vcs's makepkg supports can use to get package version information.
Signed-off-by: William Giokas <1007380@gmail.com> ---
There were a number of other formatting/typo? fixes in that patch that were good to go. I guess I can edit it just to include those bits if Jason does not resubmit.
I can resubmit the patch later tonight. Should I base the patch on William's? Or should I just resubmit my original patch with the bad parts removed?
I think that would be good. If you could just split it up into multiple parts and submit a few patches at a time, that would be best. (I'm no good with asciidoc, to be honest, so I'll leave it to people that know) Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF