2 Oct
2007
2 Oct
'07
9:06 p.m.
On 10/2/07, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
What about packages built with 3.0 that are installed / upgraded with 3.1 ? Apparently, for these packages, the build time isn't copied over to the local database. But the install date is generated and stored, in UNIX epoch.
I am not saying this behavior is bad or anything, I rather just want to check this is the intended behavior :)
Just to see if I understand you - builddate is only valid for remote packages?