11 Jan
2008
11 Jan
'08
9:03 p.m.
On Jan 11, 2008 2:53 PM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
From d0caed6bee5fec36f3239d4886db9323ffc64db9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:51:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] New reason001.py pactest
This pactest demonstrates that we should copy the reason between the to-be-replaced and replaced packages
Makes sense. Any reason why you wouldn't ever want to do this? I can think of one such scenario, not sure if it is handled or not. Installed: pkg1 (explicit) pkg2 (as dep) To be installed: pkg1 (replaces pkg2 because it includes its functionality) pkg1 should stay explicit. Along the same lines, if the reasons were reversed, we should still stay explicit, no? -Dan