On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Loui <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:37:16 +0100 Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
fwiw, there were working python bindings (and libpacman still has ones), but then problem with it was it violated KISS, so it was removed.
Was that to make libalpm development easier? Do you have any more information? Thanks.
They were removed because we didn't really do anything on top of what swig output. So we assumed the following:
* Anyone could use swig to generate the same bindings * A more focused project for python bindings would do a better job at it
Such a project would probably benefit from browsing this project's source https://gna.org/projects/pynealpm
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
-- A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it. -- Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941)