On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:09:00PM -0500, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, so you do still read the list? I was just checking. :)
heh, barely.
But before you go howling at the copyright police (which is completely different than a GPL violation, so I apologize for that mixup in the past), it sure would be nice if you gave us some credit too when you do port over our commits and work. And our project name is not pacman-g1.
ok, i'll try to stop using it, just mplayer was always called as mplayer-g1 on the mplayer-g2 mailing list and i got that bad habit, my bad. (probably "old pacman" is even more arrogant :P)
http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=f... http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=4... (ok, this one is a joke) http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=0... (you did give credit here, thanks, but still couldn't set the author right?)
yup, i think you discovered the --author switch of git-commit way before me! (nowadays i usually use it where appreciate)
http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=9... (nice jab there, pretty mature)
oh well, different targets. this is just a decision. we try to keep a stable api, you don't. both has benefits. and at the end users can choose. that's the best :)