22 Feb
2009
22 Feb
'09
11:52 a.m.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Bryan Ischo wrote:
@@ -371,7 +371,8 @@ typedef enum _pmtransconv_t { PM_TRANS_CONV_REPLACE_PKG = 0x02, PM_TRANS_CONV_CONFLICT_PKG = 0x04, PM_TRANS_CONV_CORRUPTED_PKG = 0x08, - PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10 + PM_TRANS_CONV_LOCAL_NEWER = 0x10, + PM_TRANS_CONV_REMOVE_PKGS = 0x20, } pmtransconv_t;
Is that new dangling comma at the end there a bad thing?
A quick lookup on google tells me this is valid in C99 but not in C89 standard.