13 Jan
2006
13 Jan
'06
9:43 p.m.
VMiklos wrote:
http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/replace_dont_upgra...
Why not immediately check the replace value after the for() iteration added by the patch, and do something like: /* we don't care about a to-be-replaced package's newer version */ for(j = trans->packages; j; j=j->next) { ... } if(replace) { continue; } Or is there a specific reason to pass in the first "if() / else if()" tests? -- Aurelien