18 Jul
2010
18 Jul
'10
7:03 p.m.
On 19/07/10 06:24, Xyne wrote:
Hi,
I think the pacman package should explicitly list makepkg's optional dependencies, instead of simply assuming the presence of base and base-devel.
You have reached the list for the development of pacman. For discussion of distribution specific issues on packaging, you should use the facilities provided by your distribution (e.g. mailing lists/forums/bug tracker).
Using a minimal 32-bit chroot, the only way to keep it minimal is to try to run makepkg and then track down each dependency-related error one by one until it completes.
The dependencies for makepkg are given at the top of makepkg itself. If any are missing, provide a patch or file a bug report. Allan