Idézés Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
2. this needs sync.c (pmsyncpkg_t) rework, but currently sync.c is so hard-to-understand that I don't want to do this.
If you are referring to your pending sync.c patch, here is the situation : ...
No, I didn't refer to that. But that is still interesting ;-) I just said,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:26:05PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote: that
I won't create patch for something which I don't really (want to) understand [that's why sync044.py-fix depends on sync.c-fix in my TODO list]
Ok, so I just think this is another argument for considering the merge of your sync.c fix as soon as possible, and this could motivate you to work on a fix for sync044 and/or other related things after 3.1 release.
Thx, and of course I totally agree with you ;-) I add an other small issue here: when the current code removes a package from the target list it also removes the locally installed package (if any), which can be needless (versioned conflicts, provision-conflicts, etc.) <- but at least by doing this it avoids appearing new conflicts Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/