2006/10/17, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
On 10/16/06, VMiklos <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:34:42PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm.. I just did cvs checkout and pacman is 3.4.0. But Frugalware has 3.4.2 already + some changes after 3.4.2. I'm curious will pacman3 development be in sync now?
yes, the target is to minimize the difference between the two branches
That's just version numbering anyway. I haven't touched that... I'm not really sure how to tackle it anyway... we've never released a pacman 3 here, and it seems silly to start off with a pacman 3.4.X release.... confusing confusing
yeah, there was a question about why 3.4.x in #archlinux few hours ago. BTW, yankees26 tried to compile pacman-lib but failed. Does it compile, or not yet? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)