Hi! OK. I understood. From now on, I will send only "proper" git patches. But I'm sure that I will send much fewer patches than before. I thought, that my ugly/terrible/no-patch mails were a bit helpful (at least they were bug reports); but if you cannot decode the information from this: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009655.html or from this: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009666.html, I have the feeling, that you simply don't _want_ to decode it. Since _you_ have git access, I don't understand why I should create the patch instead of you, when I gave _all_ the needed information. Yes, I'm lazy; are you lazy too ;-)? To tell the truth; I don't understand you. I tried to help you, but you prevent me from helping with this huge "officialdom". I have the feeling, that I should say thank you, that I'm allowed to send you patches instead of getting "thanks for your effort to help us improve pacman" responses (don't misunderstand me, I do it, because I _like_ hacking it). So from now on I will create my patches with git-format-patch. Bye, ngaba P.S.: Are we allowed to discuss things about development, or are we allowed to send patches only?