[pacman-dev] [namcap] Released version 3.0.3
Hello, I have released and packaged namcap 3.0.3. It includes Dan's patches for the PKGBUILD analysis and a fix for the dangling symlink detection. I hope this will be the last bugfix release before the move from [testing] to [extra]. Regards, Rémy.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Rémy Oudompheng <remyoudompheng@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have released and packaged namcap 3.0.3. It includes Dan's patches for the PKGBUILD analysis and a fix for the dangling symlink detection.
I hope this will be the last bugfix release before the move from [testing] to [extra].
Regards, Rémy.
Hi, I'm still getting this false positive: PKGBUILD (wxsvg) W: Non standard variable 'fvwm_icon_width' doesn't start with an underscore Wasn't Dan's patch supposed to fix that? Eric
On 2011/3/27 Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm still getting this false positive: PKGBUILD (wxsvg) W: Non standard variable 'fvwm_icon_width' doesn't start with an underscore
Wasn't Dan's patch supposed to fix that?
No, Dan's patch is for variables declared in the PKGBUILD, it does not ignore environment variables. I suggest two possible fixes: * add a "/usr/bin/env -i" in /usr/bin/parsepkgbuild so that it ignores your environment * modify also the Python code to check that the name of the culprit variable actually exists in the PKGBUILD Maybe both. Rémy.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Rémy Oudompheng <remyoudompheng@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2011/3/27 Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm still getting this false positive: PKGBUILD (wxsvg) W: Non standard variable 'fvwm_icon_width' doesn't start with an underscore
Wasn't Dan's patch supposed to fix that?
No, Dan's patch is for variables declared in the PKGBUILD, it does not ignore environment variables. I suggest two possible fixes: * add a "/usr/bin/env -i" in /usr/bin/parsepkgbuild so that it ignores your environment * modify also the Python code to check that the name of the culprit variable actually exists in the PKGBUILD
Maybe both.
The first seems like the more correct solution here. -Dan
participants (3)
-
Dan McGee
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Rémy Oudompheng