On 04/02/16 at 02:16am, Que Quotion wrote:

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Que Quotion <quequotion@gmail.com> wrote:

...

...

...

apg

I was not aware that there is any such patch submission procedure. I will resubmit the patch shortly.

Actually, this has proven to be exceedingly difficult. The pacman-dev archive does not offer header information, so it will not be possible for me to reply to any specific Message-ID (the best I can do, even with git send-email, is "Re: this discussion subject line").

Why are you looking at the archive? Get the Message-ID from your mail client. And, again, please fix your mail client so that your replies don't break the existing thread. It is very difficult to follow the conversation when all of your replies start a new thread.

In fact, I did submit a properly formatted patch over a week ago but it has been ignored long enough to be in last month's discussion archive.

Please look at my properly formatted patch under the same heading in last month's (last week's) discussion. Resubmitting this patch would be redundant.

You have not submitted a properly formatted patch. Every patch you have submitted was broken. Your patch needs to be inline and properly formatted to be applied with `git am`. Using `git send-email` is the easiest way to accomplish that. apg