[pacman-dev] Why is FS#30993 still open?
7 Jan
2016
7 Jan
'16
7:54 p.m.
pacman can obviously be built statically, so I've probably missed the point; why is FS#30993 still open? What functionality is broken (if any) in the static version? I haven't found anything yet, but... Regards, Alastair Hughes
11 Jan
11 Jan
4:24 a.m.
On 08/01/16 05:54, Alastair Hughes wrote:
pacman can obviously be built statically, so I've probably missed the point; why is FS#30993 still open? What functionality is broken (if any) in the static version? I haven't found anything yet, but...
History lesson! When building pacman, a "pacman-static" binary was created. In Arch, it was somewhat static... This bug was opened not long after we stopped building that. A
3340
Age (days ago)
3344
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alastair Hughes
-
Allan McRae