On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:06:26 +0300 partizan wrote:

...

Hey guys, what you think about creating separate mailing list for pacman translators? I don't read anything from pacman-dev that come to mail, but must be subscribed to this list to send translations.

A general translators list might be better I think for example arch-translators or arch-l18n, so translators can focus on localisation efforts for all Arch packages. Could be better, but how many people here are interested in

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote: translation, or how much we can contribute our little translation effort to Arch or the upstream.

Ananda

Am 08.07.2010 06:58, schrieb Dan McGee:

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:34 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:

...

...

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:06:26 +0300 partizan wrote:

...

Hey guys, what you think about creating separate mailing list for pacman translators? I don't read anything from pacman-dev that come to mail, but must be subscribed to this list to send translations.

A general translators list might be better I think for example arch-translators or arch-l18n, so translators can focus on localisation efforts for all Arch packages. Could be better, but how many people here are interested in

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote: translation, or how much we can contribute our little translation effort to Arch or the upstream. More appropriate would probably to just use arch-announce when looking for new translations.

Until we have several projects needing translating, in which case we will probably just do them all through something like transifex, this seems a bit overkill.

-Dan

I agree, that would be overkill - unless we decide to go all the way and i18n the installer, man-pages etc. Instead, we should make it a habit to notify the last translators with a personal message when updates are due. That's still a group of >20 people, and can easily be done. I (try to) read the list anyway, so I can volunteer to do that. --- Matt