Hello, Na Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:15:17AM +0200, Xavier pisal(a):

I don't know where this belongs, I originally wanted to extend Qt on libalpm, but finally I decided to move it to an external tool. If no one likes this idea, I can change it :)

well, it's up to you, i would pot it to the Qt code for sure ;)

Oh right, I didn't pay attention to this, I just copied testpkg.c and edited it :) I'm not sure how bad that is..

i'm not smart enough to answer this legal question, just i wanted to ask if somebody is sure about if this is legal to do so. just it looked strange thanks, - VMiklos

2007/9/1, Xavier :

On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 02:15:36AM +0200, VMiklos wrote:

...

Hello,

Na Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:53:54AM +0200, Chantry Xavier pisal(a):

...

Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier --- src/util/.gitignore | 1 + src/util/Makefile.am | 5 +- src/util/testdb.c | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/util/testdb.c

why this is good when there is already a -Qt? or if this is better, why not improve it?

Qt is a low level database check, it only checks for existence of the files (desc, depends, files) in the database. I wanted to keep this check, and add more high level database check, ie checking for missing dependencies, and missing or extra requiredby.

I don't know where this belongs, I originally wanted to extend Qt on libalpm, but finally I decided to move it to an external tool. If no one likes this idea, I can change it :)

It doesn't matter much to me whether this code will be in libalpm or in external script, but it definetely should go to git. ;-) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)